Back to news

Afrikaner applicants receive unexplained rejections from the US refugee programme

Hundreds of prospective migrants are challenging or trying to understand refusals as the Trump administration continues a racially selective South African resettlement policy.

Rejections emerge inside a favoured programme

Dozens of white South Africans seeking resettlement in the United States have received notices declaring them ineligible for further processing, showing that the Trump administration’s preferential Afrikaner refugee programme is rejecting some applicants even as overall arrivals accelerate. The Guardian reviewed multiple notices and reported that a support group created for rejected applicants had 311 members on September 10.

The letters reportedly provide no detailed reason and state that the decisions cannot be appealed. Some applicants obtained fuller explanations through freedom-of-information requests, uncovering concerns ranging from criminal records to discrepancies in family information. The total number of applications and refusals remains unknown because US Citizenship and Immigration Services did not provide aggregate figures.

The programme stems from a February 2025 executive order directing the State and Homeland Security departments to prioritise humanitarian admission for Afrikaners whom the administration considers victims of race-based discrimination. The same order halted broad categories of US assistance to South Africa and framed Pretoria’s land and foreign policies as hostile to American interests.

A selective refugee system under scrutiny

More than 13,000 Afrikaners have moved to the United States under the initiative since the first group arrived in May 2025, according to State Department figures cited by the Guardian. The pace rose further in August, when more than 2,600 were admitted. Earlier official data from the State Department’s refugee-processing system also documented South African arrivals across numerous US states during fiscal year 2026.

The policy remains politically contentious because the administration built it around claims that Afrikaners face systematic government persecution and a white genocide. South Africa rejects that description, while available crime data does not establish that white people or farmers suffer higher crime rates than the broader population. The programme also operates against the backdrop of severe restrictions on refugee admissions from many countries affected by war and persecution.

The emerging refusals expose a tension between political preference and individual security screening. USCIS says it reviews every application case by case and may halt processing over public-safety concerns or criminal history. What remains unclear is whether rejection rates are rising, whether programme criteria have changed, and whether applicants will receive a more transparent mechanism for correcting factual errors when no formal appeal is available.