Italy proposes relief from digital-euro fees on payments below €10
The proposal brings small merchants into negotiations over a payment system European leaders link to economic sovereignty.
Italy has proposed exempting digital-euro payments below €10 from merchant fees, Euronews reported on September 8, citing documents and sources involved in the discussions. The initiative adds a concrete pricing question to negotiations in Brussels over the proposed public currency. It remains a negotiating proposal, with no final exemption established.
The details remain unsettled. A diplomat described a possible two-cent ceiling for low-value transactions while leaving open a zero charge. Euronews reported that negotiators would meet again on September 10. That distinction matters for assessing the proposal: a low ceiling and a complete exemption would impose different conditions on the businesses accepting payments.
A sovereignty project with practical costs
The political ambition predates this week's fee proposal. In their October 2025 Euro Summit statement, European leaders linked the digital euro to a more resilient payment system, economic security and greater strategic autonomy. They also committed to strengthening the currency's international role, expanding its use in trade and finance, and advancing financial integration. This makes payment infrastructure part of a broader European policy agenda.
The Council's December 2025 negotiating position provides the institutional background. It envisaged a digital euro backed directly by the European Central Bank, available both online and offline, alongside cash and private payment methods. Its proposed compensation framework initially linked merchant and interchange fee ceilings to comparable payment instruments, with a later transition to limits based on actual digital-euro costs.
What remains to be decided
Consumer charges are a separate issue. The Council position barred fees for certain basic services, while allowing charges for additional services. It also provided for limits on holdings to address financial-stability concerns. Those provisions help explain why the negotiations extend beyond the technology itself: lawmakers must settle how the system operates for households, merchants and the institutions providing access.
The next test is whether the low-value exemption survives negotiations and appears in agreed legislation. Its significance is practical as well as political: a public payment option still needs workable terms for acceptance and service provision. Adoption of the legal framework would also leave a separate decision for the ECB on issuance. The fee discussions therefore represent one part of a project whose final design and launch remain conditional.