Texas orders penalties for data centres that withhold water-use data
Governor Greg Abbott has directed regulators to enforce disclosure rules as artificial-intelligence infrastructure increases pressure on the drought-prone state’s water and electricity systems.
Texas moves from audits to enforcement
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has instructed the Texas Water Development Board to penalise data centres that fail to provide complete and accurate information about their water consumption. The directive, announced on September 14, turns the state’s growing concern about resource-intensive computing facilities into a concrete enforcement policy. Abbott said major water users appeared to have violated requirements under the Texas Water Code and told the board to use its existing civil and criminal enforcement authority against past and future noncompliance.
Grid access adds another lever
The water order follows an August directive requiring the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the state grid operator, ERCOT, to audit data-centre projects seeking interconnection. Developers must disclose their expected water consumption, proposed sources and efficiency measures. Projects that do not complete that process can be denied permission to connect to the electricity system. Abbott now wants the water board, utility commission and ERCOT to coordinate, allowing failures in one disclosure process to trigger scrutiny in the other.
Why the disclosure matters
Data centres need water for cooling and indirectly consume additional water through electricity generation. That demand is becoming politically consequential in a state that combines recurring drought with one of the world’s fastest-growing concentrations of computing infrastructure. The Guardian reported estimates that Texas facilities consumed about 25 billion gallons in 2025 and could reach 161 billion gallons annually by 2030. Those projections are not guaranteed outcomes, but they explain why regulators want verified facility-level data before approving further expansion.
A national infrastructure debate
The state action sits within a broader US argument over who should bear the public costs of the artificial-intelligence boom. A March White House initiative obtained commitments from major technology companies to fund new electricity generation and delivery infrastructure needed by their data centres rather than transferring those costs to households. That federal pledge concerns power rather than Texas water law, but both policies apply the same principle: exceptionally large industrial users should disclose their needs and absorb the infrastructure consequences of their expansion.
What comes next
The immediate test is whether the Texas Water Development Board identifies specific facilities that submitted incomplete surveys and what penalties it pursues. Regulators must also decide how water disclosures will affect grid-connection decisions for hundreds of proposed projects. More broadly, the policy could become a model for other drought-exposed states confronting rapid data-centre construction. Its effectiveness will depend on transparent enforcement, consistent definitions of water consumption and whether regulators publish enough project-level information for communities to assess competing demands on local supplies.