Back to news

UK minister says the 1.5 million-home target now has only a slim chance of being met

Angela Rayner kept the pledge formally alive but acknowledged that inflation and construction costs have pushed England's central housing objective off course.

A flagship target moves out of reach

Britain's communities secretary Angela Rayner acknowledged on September 13 that the government has only a slim chance of delivering 1.5 million additional homes in England before the next general election. She described the total as a stretch target and said it was not being abandoned. The admission is politically important because it is the clearest recognition yet from the minister responsible for housing that planning reforms and public investment may not be enough to meet one of the government's central domestic pledges.

Rayner linked the deteriorating outlook to international inflation and rising construction costs associated with the United States' war with Iran. The Guardian reported that private housebuilders had reduced development activity even after reforms intended to unlock more land and accelerate planning decisions. Higher borrowing, material and energy costs can render approved projects commercially unviable, meaning planning permission alone does not guarantee that homes will be started or completed.

The government is shifting emphasis toward affordable supply

Although the overall target remains formally intact, ministers are placing greater emphasis on council and social housing. The government announced in August that nearly £10 billion from its wider £39 billion Social and Affordable Homes Programme would be allocated to councils and housing associations. Official programme guidance requires at least 60% of the homes delivered through the programme to be for social rent, while also supporting specialist, rural and community-led housing.

The official funding announcement and the minister's latest admission describe different parts of the same policy problem. The programme could materially expand affordable supply, but its ten-year timetable extends well beyond the current parliament. The 1.5 million pledge, by contrast, requires a rapid increase in near-term completions. Public funding can help projects proceed through a weak private market, yet land assembly, infrastructure, procurement and construction still impose delays that cannot be removed immediately.

What will show whether the gap can narrow

The next evidence will come from housing starts, planning approvals that progress into construction and the first allocations under the new affordable-homes programme. Ministers are also considering a more permissive approach to development near well-connected rail and tram stations. The critical test is whether those changes generate completed homes rather than a larger pipeline of permissions. Rayner's decision to retain the target preserves pressure on departments and councils, but her admission resets expectations: policy will now be judged not only against the headline total, but also by the number, tenure and location of homes that are actually delivered.