Back to news

Ukraine demands action after Polish politician damages UPA memorial

Kyiv asked Warsaw to assess Grzegorz Braun’s conduct and restore the border-region monument, reopening a sensitive dispute over wartime memory.

A monument becomes a diplomatic issue

Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry condemned Polish far-right politician Grzegorz Braun on September 11 after he published footage showing himself and another party member damaging a Ukrainian Insurgent Army memorial in eastern Poland. The Kyiv Independent reported that the video, released a day earlier, showed the monument being struck with a hammer. The memorial stands in Lublin province near the Ukrainian border and commemorates UPA fighters killed in a 1946 battle with the Soviet security service.

Kyiv asked Polish authorities to examine whether Braun’s actions were lawful, restore the damaged memorial and prevent similar incidents. The Ukrainian ministry characterised the episode as a political exploitation of graves while a contemporary war threatens regional security. Braun, a member of the European Parliament and leader of the Confederation of the Polish Crown, argued that the monument offended Polish victims and should be removed.

Why the symbolism is combustible

The UPA occupies sharply different places in Ukrainian and Polish historical memory. Many Ukrainians associate it primarily with resistance to Soviet rule during and after the Second World War. In Poland, it is closely associated with the Volyn massacres, in which tens of thousands of Poles were killed; retaliatory violence also killed thousands of Ukrainians. Those incompatible national narratives repeatedly turn monuments, military honours and commemorative dates into diplomatic disputes.

The vandalism occurred as the two governments were trying to create more structured historical dialogue. On September 8, Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry participated in the presentation of a project documenting victims of the Polish-Ukrainian conflict from 1939 to 1947. The official description says the initiative is intended to preserve archival information and support professional research and dialogue. That effort illustrates the institutional alternative to unilateral destruction of contested memorials.

Warsaw’s response is the next test

The episode also coincided with Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski’s visit to Kyiv, raising its diplomatic sensitivity. The immediate questions are whether Polish law enforcement opens an inquiry, whether local authorities repair or legally reassess the monument and whether national leaders separate Braun’s act from bilateral policy. Both countries have strong security incentives to contain historical disputes, but the incident shows how individual political actions can disrupt reconciliation. No military strike or ceasefire occurred, so the story is not eligible for a map alert.