Back to news

US immigrant-visa interviews resume in Hungary and Poland while a wider appointment pause remains

The selective restart follows a court-ordered end to an earlier 75-country issuance suspension but leaves applicants elsewhere facing continued uncertainty.

A limited restart

The United States has resumed processing immigrant-visa applications in Hungary and Poland while interview appointments remain paused elsewhere, Meduza reported on September 9, citing Reuters interviews with four people familiar with the policy. Two of those sources said the direction to prioritise the two countries originated at the White House. The administration has not publicly explained why Budapest and Warsaw were selected.

The development affects immigrant visas, which are intended for people seeking permanent residence, rather than the broader universe of temporary travel, study or work visas. It therefore does not amount to a general reopening of US consular processing. Applicants outside Hungary and Poland still face uncertainty over when appointments will resume and how previously delayed cases will be handled.

Court ruling and administrative review

The policy sits against a complicated sequence of restrictions. The State Department says a January pause on issuing immigrant visas to nationals of 75 countries ceased to operate on August 21 following a federal court order. Its official notice nevertheless says the department is conducting a comprehensive review of screening and vetting rules for applicants considered at risk of relying on public benefits.

That distinction matters. Ending the earlier issuance ban did not necessarily require every consular post to restore interview appointments immediately. The newly reported direction concerns the operational scheduling of cases, while the State Department notice addresses the legal status of the 75-country issuance pause. Read together, the sources indicate that the formal restriction ended but practical access remains uneven.

Why Hungary and Poland matter

Meduza's account notes the Trump administration's close political relationships with right-leaning leaders in both countries, but it does not establish that political affinity caused the prioritisation. Any such connection remains an interpretation rather than a confirmed rationale. The administration could also cite staffing, training or consular-capacity considerations, although no detailed public explanation was available in the material reviewed.

The next points to watch are a formal State Department explanation, the reopening schedule for other posts and any new guidance on public-charge assessments. Courts may also remain important if operational delays are alleged to recreate a restriction already set aside. Until the administration publishes a wider timetable, the Hungary-Poland restart represents a narrow change rather than a return to normal immigrant-visa service.