Back to news

Zelensky says Kyiv airports could receive delegations with a safe corridor

The conditional proposal concerns diplomatic travel while civilian aviation remains restricted by wartime risks.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said on September 8 that airports in Kyiv and its surrounding region were technically prepared to receive aircraft carrying foreign delegations, provided Russia agreed to a safe corridor, the Kyiv Independent reported. The statement identifies a possible arrangement for diplomatic travel without establishing that such a corridor has been agreed or that flights will begin.

Zelensky said Ukraine had considered receiving a US aircraft for the September 6 visit by presidential envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. They ultimately travelled by train. The distinction between an airport's technical readiness and a flight's security is central to the proposal: preparing facilities cannot itself remove the danger posed by military activity along an aircraft's route.

Civilian restrictions remain extensive

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency's Ukraine bulletin provides the relevant operational background. Originally issued in February 2022 and revised on July 24, 2026, it identifies Ukrainian airspace as an active conflict zone and references Ukraine's notice closing it to civil aviation. Its geographic coverage includes Kyiv, Lviv, Dnipro, Simferopol and Odesa, across all flight levels.

EASA advises the operators covered by the bulletin against flights in the affected airspace, including airport departures and landings. It identifies intentional targeting and the misidentification of civilian aircraft among the dangers. The July revision extended the bulletin's validity to January 31, 2027, unless reviewed earlier. That date is the advisory's review horizon, not an announced date for Ukrainian airports to reopen.

A wider aviation safety problem

The regional safety problem also extends beyond Ukraine. In a separate January 2025 announcement, EASA broadened its advice concerning Russian airspace west of longitude 60 degrees east, citing risks associated with the war. That historical notice illustrates the cross-border scope of aviation risk assessment; its original validity period should not be mistaken for a current operating permission or a fresh September decision.

For the diplomatic proposal, the next steps to watch are an explicit corridor agreement and the conditions under which a particular delegation would travel. A special arrangement would require its own security assessment and would not, by itself, establish a general return of passenger services. Zelensky's statement therefore opens a logistical possibility for foreign visits while leaving the decisive security question unresolved: whether the parties can provide and maintain conditions under which the planned aircraft can travel safely.